Colorado has the highest Gear Rescue Score.
Colorado ranks first overall with a score of 86.3 out of 100.
A small tear, broken zipper or worn strap does not always mean the end. Check the damage, compare your options and find the most useful next step.
Illustrative guidance only. Technical or safety-related damage should be professionally assessed.
Choose an item, place the damage and try a patch. Move the slider to compare the worn area with an illustrative repair.
Round gold patch selected. Have the damaged area inspected before repair.
More use. Less waste.Where you live can shape what happens to damaged gear. This index explores where repair, reuse and textile recovery are easiest to reach.
Explore your stateThree standout results from the illustrative state comparison.
Colorado ranks first overall with a score of 86.3 out of 100.
It receives the highest score for access to resale, donation and clothing-bank services.
It receives the highest score for clear information about repairing, reusing or recovering damaged gear.
Choose a measure, then select a state to see how it performs. Darker tiles show stronger access.
Showing the top 10. Scroll for all 50 states; swipe across on smaller screens.
| Rank | State | Gear Rescue Score | Repair Access | Second-Life Options | Textile Recovery | Repair Information |
|---|
Each state receives a score out of 100 for four areas. The scores are combined into the final Gear Rescue Score, with repair access carrying the greatest weight.
The number and spread of tailors, clothing-repair services, outdoor-gear specialists and community repair services.
Places that help usable clothing and gear move to another owner, including donation organizations, resale services, clothing banks and gear exchanges.
The availability of services that accept clothing and textiles that can no longer be repaired or reused.
How clearly public websites explain where people can repair, donate, reuse or recover damaged items.
This independent CiteDelta portfolio concept uses illustrative rankings, scores and findings. The model was designed around the types of information available from the named sources, but it is not a verified state-level study. Patagonia was not involved in its creation.